Monday, July 16, 2007

Monday again…

I have noticed a particular start to some top-down shawl patterns.  It generally goes:

Cast on a few stitches provisionally.
Knit x number of rows.
Pick up stitches along side and knit.
Undo provisional cast-on and knit those stitches.

At this point the stitch patterning for the shawl begins.  Sometimes that x number of rows is longer as with the Moonlight Sonata and done this way, it seems to be an edging or a border.  But often that x number of rows is short, 14 - 20 or so, as with the Kiri.

What’s that about?  I’ve seen it several times now, but none of the patterns have explained why that’s a good way to start a top-down shawl.  So in the interest of scientific exploration (ahem…), I decided to play with the idea and see if I could figure it out :)

Garter stitch start and top border



I started off with 5 provisionally cast-on stitches which I knit for 20 rows (10 garter st ridges).  Then I picked up 10 stitches down the side , undid the provisional cast-on and knit those stitches too: 20 stitches in all.  This provided me with a somewhat crescent shaped piece of knitting upon which I then started working the standard increases - one on either side of the center stitch(es) and one at each end of the row - 4 increase stitches per right side row.

I couldn’t come to any conclusion.  Maybe I’m just being thick.  This method does provide a nice, tidy start and perhaps that’s all it’s supposed to do.  However, I kind of got carried away with the colors and continued on the item past what could be called the experimental stage :)

I had started with two strands of alpaca lace weight plus a strand of variegated rayon thread.  As I was perusing the stash, I noticed some lovely plum colored Cleckheaton mohair wool (a gift from dear Nat at KnittingNatty) that would coordinate beautifully with the rose colored lace weight and the multi-colored rayon and the next thing I knew I was swapping out colors as the spirit moved me and adding things like eyelets and petals…

Eyelets petals and color changes



I hardly put this down all weekend and pretty much ignored everything else as the only thing I seemed to be able to think of was getting back to all that luscious color :)  Yes, carried away is the right phrase.  As of this morning, it looked like this:

Sort of shawl



Sizewise, I imagine this will be more like a generous scarf or a shoulder shawl when it’s complete.  The thing is, I think, to find a yarn you absolutely adore (maybe in a couple of colors) and then give yourself permission to play as suits your fancy.  I’m having so much fun with this which is why, I suppose, I can’t put it down :)

Before I started that little sojourn though, I played with something else.  I got the link from Omly over at Omly Crafts for Birds of a Feather.  I haven’t been attracted much to the amigurumi crochet projects, but this was just too cute for words…

Birds of a Feather



The little one on the left was the first attempt and shows it :)  The red one is a little better, I think and I altered the pattern to the extent that the tail and wings were crocheted as I went along, rather than created separately and stitched on afterwards.  Just me being lazy.  The eyes and beak are embroidered because I had neither craft doll eyes nor felt.

Myria likes ‘em :)

Babbled by Robbyn on 07/16 at 10:53 AM
(8) Comments • (0) TrackbacksPermalink
 
trackback URL for this entry: Trackbacks are disabled for this entry
 
Trackbacks

No trackbacks yet.

Comments
  1. That shawl is BEAUTIFUL!!!  And I would also love to know why top-down shawls start that way.  But for some reason those little bird things are upsetting me…. They’re scary!  Why are they scary?!  I think they need mouths.  They can’t EAT or chirp. (OK, I will shut up and go back to work now.)

    Posted by Rob  on  07/16  at  04:11 PM
    Location : PA

  2. Rob - LOL!  That yellow spot between the eyes?  That’s supposed to be a beak.  Use your imagination.  I had been thinking about including a small flock of these in next year’s Dulaan box but maybe I should make the beaks more clearly defined?

    I don’t know why I’m making another shawl - I just finished one for heaven’s sake.  Seduced by the colors I think…and I guess that’s as good a reason as any :)

    Posted by Robbyn  on  07/16  at  04:36 PM
    Location : Second star to the right and straight on 'til morn

  3. Beautiful shawl. The yarn is just gorgeous. And the amigurumi? Too adorable for words.

    Posted by Opal  on  07/16  at  05:51 PM
    Location : Honolulu, HI

  4. Opal - It’s funny how you can have yarn for a long time before something clicks, a few things come together and you go “Oh my God!  Why didn’t I see this before!”

    The birds are really quick to make and don’t take much in the way of materials.  And they’re just ridiculously cute :)

    Posted by Robbyn  on  07/16  at  06:45 PM
    Location : Second star to the right and straight on 'til morn

  5. Sorry.  Those beaks look like noses.  Yes, I know birds don’t have noses but I got that image in my head and now I can’t get it out.  Sigh.  It has been that kind of summer…

    Posted by Rob  on  07/17  at  12:31 PM
    Location :

  6. Rob - Actually, since you brought it to my attention, I’ve been thinking about how to provide something a little more 3-dimensional.  I think it would look better.  It just has to fit my criterion of being able to be worked as you go along.  I don’t really want to sew things on afterwards :)

    Posted by Robbyn  on  07/17  at  01:57 PM
    Location : Second star to the right and straight on 'til morn

  7. awww, love the crocheted birds! What else could we expect from our tweety- pie? (ducks, runs for cover…)

    Posted by nat  on  07/21  at  08:26 PM
    Location : happy as a clam but busy busy busy

  8. Nat - Ducks?!?!  Hehe…  (I don’t know about the “runs-for-cover” part - what kind of bird is that?)

    Posted by Robbyn  on  07/22  at  03:39 PM
    Location : Following the yellow brick road...

Commenting is not available in this weblog entry.
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.